ADVERTISEMENT

So what are the TV Libs lying about today? This sure blew up in their face. Like that never happens right?

JediRebel

All-Pro NFL
Gold Member
Dec 3, 2012
68,118
61,739
113
Kentucky Lake Tennessee

Judge Grants Trump Motion for Special Master to Review Records Seized by FBI​

By Zachary Stieber
September 5, 2022 Updated: September 5, 2022
1637 SHARES | FRIENDS READ FREE
Share Email
919 COMMENTS
comment_img.png
Comment

0:004:16

1

A U.S. judge on Sept. 5 agreed to insert a special master into the review process for records seized from former President Donald Trump’s Florida home.
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, ordered the appointment of a special master to review the seized property for items and documents that may be covered by attorney-client or executive privilege.
“In addition to being deprived of potentially significant personal documents, which alone creates a real harm, Plaintiff faces an unquantifiable potential harm by way of improper disclosure of sensitive information to the public,” Cannon wrote in her 24-page order, released several days after a hearing in which she heard arguments from Trump’s lawyers and attorneys for the government.
“Further, Plaintiff is at risk of suffering injury from the Government’s retention and potential use of privileged materials in the course of a process that, thus far, has been closed off to Plaintiff and that has raised at least some concerns as to its efficacy, even if inadvertently so,” she added.
A special master is an independent third party who assists with sensitive cases.
Experience the best way to read The Epoch Times online. Try our free app for a limited time.
FBI agents seized records, notes, and other items from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, on Aug. 8.
MOST READ
Judge Grants Trump Motion for Special Master to Review Records Seized by FBI
West Virginia Coal Miners Help Stranded Washingtonian With Dead Electric Car

Read More
Cannon said she was swayed to side with Trump in part because the U.S. government’s filter team, which was supposed to identify all potentially privileged items, failed to do so.
“Those instances alone, even if entirely inadvertent, yield questions about the adequacy of the filter review process,” the judge said.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Member-Only Message Boards

  • Exclusive coverage of Rivals Camp Series

  • Exclusive Highlights and Recruiting Interviews

  • Breaking Recruiting News

Log in or subscribe today