ChatGPT Deep Research analysis of next seasons hoop team

[OrangeBeachReb]

The nuances of ChatGPT understanding these players as it fits into Beard‘s team is quite amazing.

Note: copy and pasting from ChatGPT always gives weird formatting with waytoo many spaces between paragraphs, but I’m not going back and taking those all out. I’m on my phone sorry.

Also, it didn’t take into account Grayson so I added it at the very end.




2025–26 Ole Miss Men’s Basketball Scouting Report


Roster Breakdown and Key Player Profiles


Overview: Head coach Chris Beard enters 2025–26 with a virtually new roster. The Rebels return only one rotation player (forward Malik Dia) from last year’s Sweet 16 team, while adding eight newcomers via the transfer portal (plus one international signee). This influx includes several high-major transfers and productive mid-major standouts, giving Ole Miss an infusion of talent and experience. The table below summarizes the key returning and incoming players and their 2024–25 statistics:

Player	Pos	Ht/Wt	Previous Team (Conf)	2024–25 Stats
Malik Dia (Jr.)	F	6’9”, 250 lbs	Ole Miss (SEC – returning)	10.8 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 0.8 APG, 46.7% FG , 34.5% 3PT¹
Kezza Giffa (Sr.)	G	6’2”, ~190 lbs	High Point (Big South)	14.6 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 2.5 APG, 40% FG, 30+% 3PT
Malik Dia (Ole Miss)	See above (returning starter)
James Scott (So.)	F/C	6’11”, 220 lbs	Louisville (ACC)	7.1 PPG, 6.1 RPG, 1.4 APG, 0.9 BPG, 75.5% FG
Ilias Kamardine (Jr.)	G	6’4”, 180 lbs	JDA Dijon (France – Pro)	7.2 PPG, 1.8 APG, 1.6 RPG, 42% FG, 38% 3PT
AJ Storr (Sr.)	G/F	6’7”, 205 lbs	Kansas (Big 12)	6.1 PPG, 1.7 RPG, 38.4% FG, 29.1% 3PT
Corey Chest (So.)	F	6’8”, 220 lbs	LSU (SEC)	6.1 PPG, 6.6 RPG, 1.2 BPG, 60.7% FG
Koren Johnson (Jr.)	G	6’2”, 175 lbs	Louisville (ACC)	3.0 PPG, 2.5 APG (in 2 games) – injured; 11.1 PPG, 2.7 APG in 2023–24 at Washington
Augusto Cassiá (So.)	F	6’8”, 220 lbs	Butler (Big East)	5.1 PPG, 3.1 RPG, 66.7% FG (10 games)
Travis Perry (So.)	G	6’1”, 188 lbs	Kentucky (SEC)	2.7 PPG, 31.3% FG, 32.1% 3PT (9.6 min/game)

1: Dia’s 3PT% is from 2023–24 at Belmont; he shot ~34% 3PT in 2024–25.





2024–25 scoring averages for Ole Miss’s key returnee and new additions. Giffa led High Point with 14.6 PPG, while Dia averaged 10.8 PPG as Ole Miss’s starting forward .





Below are detailed scouting reports for the lone returner and each incoming transfer, including physical profile, previous team/conference, key stats, strengths, weaknesses, and expected role in 2025–26.








Malik Dia – 6’9” 250 lbs, Forward (Returning, Ole Miss)

• Source: Returning junior (started at PF/C for Ole Miss last year; previously at Belmont/Vanderbilt – SEC).
• 2024–25 Stats: 10.8 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 46.7% FG, 34% 3PT . Second-leading scorer and top rebounder for the Rebels in the NCAA Tournament run.
• ✅ Strengths: Versatile inside-out scorer with an NBA-ready build and skillset . Can score on the block or step out to the perimeter (hit 26 threes at ~34% last year). Soft touch around the rim and a solid mid-range game. Uses his 250 lb frame to rebound and finish through contact in the paint. As a junior, brings leadership and familiarity with Beard’s system.
• ⚠️ Weaknesses: Conditioning and consistency have been areas of focus – he has worked on getting in better shape to increase his mobility and stamina . Defensively, he can improve his lateral quickness when guarding quicker bigs and avoid foul trouble. At times he tried to do too much offensively; simplifying his game and playing to his strengths should elevate his efficiency .
• Projected Role: Returning starter and likely focal point of the frontcourt. Dia will anchor the Rebels inside as the primary post scorer and rebounder. Ole Miss will look to him as a go-to option and veteran leader – he’s expected to be a team captain and could contend for All-SEC honors if he makes the leap from solid to dominant.

Kezza Giffa – 6’2”


Guard


(Sr., Transfer from High Point – Big South)

• Source: Graduate transfer guard; 2× First-Team All-Big South at High Point . Originally from France (started at UTEP, then JUCO, then High Point).
• 2024–25 Stats: 14.6 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 2.5 APG, 1.1 SPG; 40% FG, ~32% 3PT . Led High Point in scoring and earned all-conference honors.
• ✅ Strengths: Dynamic scorer and playmaker. Lightning-quick first step and creative ball-handler, able to generate offense off the dribble. Good playmaking instincts – averaged 2.5 assists and can act as a secondary point guard . Clutch shot-maker who was the go-to guy at High Point. Brings a wealth of experience and a competitive edge from playing in the NCAA tournament (led High Point to a First Four upset before falling to Purdue) .
• ⚠️ Weaknesses: Size (6’2”) could be a slight drawback when defending taller wings, and he’ll face a jump in competition from Big South to SEC. His shooting is decent but not elite – around low-30s% from three – so he can be streaky from deep. Occasionally forced tough shots as the primary option at High Point, so shot selection and off-ball movement are areas to monitor as he adjusts to not having to carry the scoring load.
• Projected Role: Expected starting combo guard or sixth man who provides instant offense. Giffa should slot into the Rebels’ backcourt rotation immediately, likely contending for a starting guard spot. His scoring punch and playmaking will be crucial, and he could emerge as Ole Miss’s top perimeter scorer. Look for Beard to pair him with a true point guard at times to maximize his off-ball scoring as well.

James Scott – 6’11”


Forward/Center


(So., Transfer from Louisville – ACC)

• Source: Sophomore post player; started 31 games at Louisville last year . Began at College of Charleston (2023) before transferring to Louisville.
• 2024–25 Stats: 7.1 PPG, 6.1 RPG, 1.4 APG, 0.9 BPG; 75.5% FG . (At Louisville, primarily scored on dunks/layups – 108–143 FG).
• ✅ Strengths: Length and athleticism in the frontcourt. Legit 6’11” (7’1” in shoes) with long arms, providing rim protection (nearly 1 block per game) and rebounding . Extremely efficient around the basket – led Louisville with 75.5% field goal shooting , mostly off cuts, putbacks, and dump-offs. Mobile for his size; can run the floor and finish above the rim. At 220 lbs, has room to add strength, but already shows good mobility for a big man.
• ⚠️ Weaknesses: Limited offensive range – virtually all his scoring came in the paint (he attempted zero threes and few mid-range shots at Louisville). Will need to develop post moves or a mid-range jumper to become a more versatile scorer. As a sophomore, consistency and physical maturity are still developing; he may need to adjust to being a focal point inside (only 7.1 PPG as a complementary player). Also, foul trouble occasionally sidelined him (averaged ~3 fouls in 27 MPG at Louisville).
• Projected Role: Likely starting center. Scott projects as the rim-running, defensive anchor for Ole Miss. His job will be to patrol the paint, block shots, rebound, and finish high-percentage looks created by the guards. If he can replicate or build on his Louisville production, he gives the Rebels the true center presence they lacked at times last year. Expect him to play 20–25 minutes as a low-usage, high-efficiency big man who complements Dia in the frontcourt.

Ilias Kamardine – 6’4”


Guard


(Jr., International signee from France’s LNB Pro A)

• Source: Transfer from professional play – spent 2024–25 with JDA Dijon in France’s top league (LNB Pro A). Former French U19 national team member.
• 2024–25 Stats: 7.2 PPG, 1.8 APG, 1.6 RPG in 17.1 minutes (26 games) . Shot 42% from the field and 38% from three (roughly 41% on spot-up threes) . Also averaged ~8.0 PPG, 2.4 APG in EuroCup play .
• ✅ Strengths: Sharpshooter with a high basketball IQ. Kamardine is a proven floor-spacer – he hit about 38–39% from international three-point range, often as a spot-up specialist . Has a soft touch at the rim and crafty finishing ability thanks to his professional experience. Solid size for a combo guard (listed 6’4”–6’5” with long arms) and competes on defense. Also brings playmaking skills; his 1.8 assists don’t fully show it, but he can run secondary pick-and-roll and make the right pass. At 21, he’s played against grown men in Europe, so he has a poise and maturity that should translate.
• ⚠️ Weaknesses: Needs to adjust to the athleticism and pace of SEC play coming from Europe. His shooting form, while accurate, has a slow release – he takes a bit long to load up, which could allow defenders to contest his shots if he doesn’t quicken his trigger . Not an explosive one-on-one creator; his handle is tight but conservative, so he can struggle to blow by quicker defenders (he’s more comfortable in catch-and-shoot or straight-line drives). Also, he’s transitioning from a role player in France to an expected contributor at Ole Miss, so there may be an adjustment period in asserting himself offensively.
• Projected Role: Key rotational guard with a chance to start at shooting guard. Kamardine’s shooting and pro experience make him an appealing 3-and-D option on the wing. He could be the floor-spacer Ole Miss needs to open driving lanes for others. Look for him to play significant minutes, perhaps as the first guard off the bench – and if his shot is falling consistently, he could close games for the Rebels. Beard will likely use Kamardine in designed spot-up situations and as a steadying presence in the backcourt.

AJ Storr – 6’7”


Wing


(Sr., Transfer from Kansas – Big 12)

• Source: Senior swingman; former Top-40 recruit who has played at St. John’s, Wisconsin, and Kansas. Transferring to Ole Miss for his final year (fourth school in four seasons) .
• 2024–25 Stats: 6.1 PPG, 1.7 RPG in 15.7 minutes at Kansas . Shot 38.4% FG, 29.1% 3PT . (2023–24 at Wisconsin: 16.8 PPG, 3.9 RPG, All-Big Ten Second Team) .
• ✅ Strengths: Athletic scoring wing with the talent to take over games. At 6’7” with long arms, Storr can attack the rim aggressively and finish above the rim or through contact. He’s shown he can be a high-volume scorer – he was Wisconsin’s leading scorer at 16.8 PPG two years ago . Excels in transition and slashing to the hoop; has a quick first step for a wing his size. Also a capable defender when engaged, using his size to guard 2–3 positions on the perimeter. Having been in Big East, Big Ten, and Big 12 battles, he brings big-game experience and is unafraid of top competition.
• ⚠️ Weaknesses: Consistency and shot selection have been issues. Storr “never quite fit” at Kansas, seeing his productivity plummet – he sometimes settled for contested jumpers rather than using his physical advantages. His three-point shooting is streaky (career ~32% from deep) and he can go cold if he falls in love with the perimeter shot (as happened at Kansas). Additionally, bouncing between programs raises questions about his adaptability to new systems; he’ll need to buy into Beard’s scheme quickly. Off-ball defense and effort have been cited as areas to improve, as he has all the tools but can lose focus on that end.
• Projected Role: Probable starting wing (small forward). Ole Miss will be counting on Storr to tap back into the form he showed at Wisconsin as a go-to scorer. He has SEC All-Transfer potential if he meshes well – think of him as a high-upside X-factor. Expect Beard to empower Storr as a primary option offensively: isolations, attacking mismatches, and using him as a finisher in half-court sets. If he can find a balance between attacking the rim and taking smart outside shots, Storr could lead the team in scoring. At minimum, he’ll be in the top 6 rotation and often tasked with guarding the opponent’s best wing due to his size and athleticism.

Corey Chest – 6’8”


Forward


(So., Transfer from LSU – SEC)

• Source: Redshirt sophomore forward; Top-100 recruit in 2023. Spent two years at LSU (redshirted 2023–24, then played 2024–25).
• 2024–25 Stats: 6.1 PPG, 6.6 RPG, 1.2 BPG, 60.7% FG in 24.5 minutes . Recorded multiple double-digit rebounding games in SEC play .
• ✅ Strengths: High-motor rebounder and defender. Chest has a nose for the ball – he led LSU in rebounding rate, grabbing 6.6 per game and often providing second chances on the offensive glass . At 6’8” and a solid ~220 lbs, he’s strong and athletic, allowing him to guard both power forwards and centers. He’s an active shot-blocker (1.2 blocks) and can switch onto guards in a pinch, fitting the versatile defensive mold Beard covets. Offensively, he’s an efficient finisher (61% FG) who runs the floor well and thrives in transition and pick-and-roll dives. His energy and toughness stood out even as a freshman – he does the dirty work inside.
• ⚠️ Weaknesses: Still developing his offensive skillset. Most of Chest’s points come on dunks, put-backs, and rim runs; he has almost no back-to-the-basket game yet and is not a threat outside the paint (virtually zero jump shots attempted). He averaged only 6.1 points because he wasn’t a focal point offensively – he’ll need to expand his scoring tools to become more well-rounded. Free throw shooting is a minor concern (mid-60s% shooter). Also, as a young player, he can be prone to defensive lapses when over-helping and occasionally got caught out of position going for blocks. Improving his defensive discipline and avoiding cheap fouls will be key to staying on the court.
• Projected Role: First big man off the bench (or starting power forward if Ole Miss goes big). Chest will likely play significant minutes in a frontcourt rotation with Dia and Scott. In many ways, he could fill the role of the hustle/energy forward, anchoring the second unit’s defense and crashing the boards. Don’t be surprised if Beard uses Chest and Dia together in a physical twin-towers lineup against certain opponents. His ceiling is high – by SEC play he could even push for a starting role if his offensive game comes along. At minimum, Chest will be a key defender and rebounder in crunch time lineups.

Koren Johnson – 6’2”


Point Guard


(Jr., Transfer from Louisville – ACC)

• Source: Former 4-star recruit (class of 2022). Spent freshman year at Washington (Pac-12) and sophomore year at Louisville. Missed most of 2024–25 due to injury (shoulder surgery) .
• 2024–25 Stats: 3.0 PPG, 2.5 APG in only 2 games at Louisville (medical redshirt) . 2023–24 at Washington: 11.1 PPG, 2.7 APG, 1.0 SPG, 36% 3PT in 30.5 minutes .
• ✅ Strengths: Speedy playmaker and ball-handler. Johnson is a true point guard with excellent quickness and bounce – at Washington he routinely blew by defenders to penetrate and create plays. He has solid court vision and can set up teammates (career ~3 assists per game). Was a capable scorer in the Pac-12, dropping 11+ points a night as a freshman, including some big games in conference play. Defensively, he has the tools to be a pesky on-ball defender; he’s laterally quick and was known for his defensive intensity in high school (Seattle Garfield) and at UW. Johnson was a highly touted recruit for a reason: he’s a floor general type who can push tempo and bring energy on both ends.
• ⚠️ Weaknesses: Health and rust are the biggest concerns. He is coming off shoulder surgery that essentially wiped out last season – he hasn’t played extended minutes in over a year. There may be some adjustment regaining his feel and confidence, especially in shooting (he went 2–7 FG in his brief Louisville stint). His outside shot is acceptable but not a sure strength (36% from three at UW, but that came on limited volume). Additionally, at 6’2” 175, he’s slightly undersized, and there were occasions at Washington where bigger guards could shoot over him or bump him off driving lanes. Decision-making can improve as well; being a young PG, he had typical freshman turnovers and will need to run the offense efficiently under Beard.
• Projected Role: Projected starting point guard if fully healthy. Johnson will likely be tasked with running the Rebel offense and distributing the ball to their many scoring weapons. Ole Miss lacked a true pass-first point after Pedulla’s departure, so Johnson fills a clear need. The staff will bring him along carefully given his injury history, possibly using him in tandem with another ball-handler (like Giffa or Perry) early in the season. If he returns to his UW form, Johnson’s penetration and playmaking could elevate the whole offense. Look for him to push the pace in transition and set the defensive tone by picking up opposing PGs full-court – his quickness and handle will be key to Ole Miss unlocking its potential.

Augusto “Gutto” Cassiá – 6’8”


Forward


(So., Transfer from Butler – Big East)

• Source: Sophomore stretch-four originally from Brazil. Former 4★ recruit (Top-150 prospect in 2023) . Played 25 games (mostly off bench) at Butler as a freshman, then 10 games in 2024–25 before a knee injury; left the program in Feb 2025 .
• 2024–25 Stats: 5.1 PPG, 3.1 RPG, 66.7% FG in 10 games (all starts) . Improved from 2.4 PPG as a freshman to 5.1 PPG before injury as a sophomore, shooting an excellent percentage in limited action.
• ✅ Strengths: Skilled face-up forward with a smooth offensive game. Cassiá has international academy experience (NBA Global Academy) and it shows – he’s comfortable with the ball at 6’8” and can hit mid-range jumpers and the occasional three. Good pick-and-pop potential; he didn’t take many threes at Butler but has a soft shooting touch in practice. Coordinated athlete who runs the floor well and has some bounce (will throw down dunks in space). When healthy, he showed flashes of being a versatile scorer: he can drive past slower bigs or shoot over smaller defenders. Also a solid rebounder for his position and uses his length to be disruptive defensively. At only 20, he has upside that Chris Beard hopes to unlock over the next few years.
• ⚠️ Weaknesses: Health and experience are question marks. Cassiá’s college career has been stop-and-start – a muscle strain delayed his freshman debut, and a knee ligament injury ended his sophomore season early . He hasn’t played heavy minutes yet, so conditioning and rust might be factors as he ramps up. Defensively, he’ll need to prove he can guard SEC-caliber forwards; at Butler he sometimes got caught between positions (not quick enough to chase small forwards, not bulky enough to battle true post players). Adding strength (listed 220 lbs) will help him hold position inside. Additionally, while he’s skilled, he hasn’t established a consistent role – he’ll need to carve out his niche (whether as a shooter, slasher, or energy guy) and improve his defensive fundamentals to earn minutes in a crowded frontcourt.
• Projected Role: Developmental rotation forward. Cassiá will likely start as a bench forward, spelling Dia or Chest in the power forward slot. If fully recovered, he could provide a scoring spark with his face-up skills against opposing second units. Think of him as a wildcard – some nights his offensive talent may shine and earn him extended run, especially if Ole Miss needs shooting in the frontcourt. Over time, he could develop into a stretch-4 starter, but initially expect him to play 10–15 minutes as he adjusts to Beard’s defensive demands and works back to full speed. Ole Miss will be patient given he has multiple years of eligibility; any immediate contribution (e.g. 5–6 points, a couple rebounds per game) will be a bonus this season.

Travis Perry – 6’1”


Guard


(So., Transfer from Kentucky – SEC)

• Source: Sophomore combo guard. Kentucky’s all-time leading high school scorer (4,367 career points) out of Eddyville, KY . Four-star recruit, played one season at Kentucky before transferring.
• 2024–25 Stats: 2.7 PPG, 0.8 APG, 31.3% FG, 32.1% 3PT in 9.6 minutes as a freshman at UK . (Appeared in 27 games, primarily in a reserve role behind UK’s star freshmen backcourt.)
• ✅ Strengths: Elite shooter and scorer by pedigree. Perry is a coach’s son type of guard with a high basketball IQ and deep shooting range. In high school he was a prolific 3-point marksman and showed flashes of that at Kentucky – he’s confident spotting up from well beyond the arc. Has a quick release and is unfazed by big moments (scored over 5,000 points in HS, so he’s no stranger to carrying an offense) . Despite limited minutes, he hit some timely threes for UK and demonstrated solid decision-making when running the point. He’s also a scrappy competitor: not afraid to take a charge or dive for loose balls. At 6’1”, he compensates with craftiness – uses change of pace and clever angles to get his shot off or find teammates.
• ⚠️ Weaknesses: Transition to the college game has been an adjustment. Perry’s shooting in year 1 (31% FG) reflects the difficulty he had finding rhythm in a crowded Kentucky rotation. He’s slightly undersized for a shooting guard and not an explosive athlete, which can make it harder for him to create separation against high-major defenders. On defense, his physical limitations show up when guarding bigger, more athletic guards – he’ll need to rely on positioning and anticipation to be effective. Also, as a young player, consistency is a work in progress; he might have one hot shooting night followed by a cold one. He’ll need to prove he can handle extended minutes and the physicality of the SEC without wearing down.
• Projected Role: Sharpshooter off the bench. Perry will likely fill the role of designated shooter in the Rebels’ backcourt rotation. Look for him to come in to stretch the floor, especially if the offense needs a spark or against zone defenses. He could play alongside a primary ball-handler as a spot-up 2-guard, but also has the handle to run the point in small lineups. If his shots fall consistently, Perry could carve out 15+ minutes per game. His local ties and scoring ability make him a fan favorite candidate. Long-term, the staff views him as a foundational piece (he has three years left), so this season he’ll be given opportunities to grow through any early growing pains. Don’t underestimate him – Perry is a sleeper breakout candidate if he adapts to Beard’s system, as his shooting and savvy are skills every team needs.

(Note: Guard Eduardo Klafke (6’5” So.) is the only other scholarship returner aside from Dia. Klafke saw limited action last year (1.4 PPG) and is a sharpshooting prospect from Brazil. He will compete for depth minutes in the backcourt, potentially redshirting if the rotation is too crowded.)








Holistic Team Analysis











Team Strengths and Concerns








Ole Miss’s revamped roster boasts dramatically improved talent and depth. The Rebels have upgraded their athleticism and scoring at nearly every position:

• Backcourt Depth & Talent: The guard group is now loaded. Ole Miss can deploy big, athletic wings like AJ Storr and Kezza Giffa who can create their own shot, a true point guard in Koren Johnson to orchestrate the offense, and deadly shooters in Ilias Kamardine and Travis Perry on the perimeter. This versatility addresses a weakness from last year’s squad (which at times lacked shot-makers outside of Murrell/Pedulla). Now, Beard has the pieces to mix and match lineups – for example, a small-ball lineup with four guards who can all handle and shoot, or a bigger lineup with multiple 6’7″ wings. The influx of scoring options should prevent offensive droughts; on any given night, a different Rebel could lead the team in points.
• Frontcourt Size & Physicality: Adding a 7-footer (James Scott) and a high-motor 6’8″ rebounder (Corey Chest) alongside returning 6’9″ Malik Dia significantly bolsters the interior. Last season, Ole Miss at times struggled with size and rebounding (they were a middling rebounding team in SEC play) – this year’s team should turn that weakness into a strength . Scott and Chest bring rim protection and board work, and Dia is an inside-out threat. The frontcourt now has enough depth to withstand foul trouble or injuries, which is crucial in the grind of SEC play.
• Experience and Leadership: Despite so many newcomers, most of them are older players. Storr, Giffa, Kamardine, Scott – all are upperclassmen who have played in high-pressure environments (NCAA/NIT games, pro leagues, high-major conferences). They join Malik Dia, who as a junior leader and returning starter, provides continuity. This maturity should translate into a shorter gelling period and a team that won’t be rattled easily. Beard has essentially recruited an experienced team, not a rebuilding youth project. That bodes well for handling hostile SEC arenas and late-game situations.

However, with all the promise comes some clear concerns:

• Chemistry & Cohesion: Integrating so many new pieces is challenge #1. There is only one significant holdover (Dia), so roles and pecking order will have to be established from scratch. It may take time for the offense to find its flow and for players to build on-court chemistry. Early season growing pains – turnovers, defensive miscommunications, inconsistent rotations – are possible as everyone adapts to new teammates. Beard will need to fast-track the cohesion, perhaps simplifying schemes initially while emphasizing team bonding, to unlock this roster’s potential by conference play.
• Defined Roles/Hierarchy: Along with chemistry, figuring out who the go-to guys are is critical. Last year, Ole Miss knew in crunch time to put the ball in Matthew Murrell or Sean Pedulla’s hands. This year, is that go-to scorer Storr? Dia? Giffa? It’s unclear yet. Having multiple capable scorers is a good problem, but if not managed, it can lead to confusion or unbalanced shot distribution. Coach Beard must identify clear offensive roles – e.g., Storr as primary creator on the wing, Dia as inside focus, Giffa as late-clock playmaker, etc. – so that the team is organized in key moments. Similarly, defensively, leadership must emerge to quarterback the “no-middle” scheme (last year that was often Pedulla or Brakefield).
• Outside Shooting Consistency: While there are several capable shooters, none is a proven elite sniper at the high-major level yet. Kamardine shot well in Europe (38% 3PT) but will the longer NCAA line bother him? Perry has the reputation but not the sample size in college. Storr and Giffa are around 30–32% career from deep; Johnson hit 36% at UW but on few attempts. The team lost its best shooter from last year (Murrell). It’s possible Ole Miss lights it up from three, but it’s equally possible this is an average perimeter shooting team. If the outside shots don’t fall, spacing could shrink for drivers like Storr/Johnson. This is an area to monitor – one of these guards will need to become the knockdown 3-point shooter that keeps defenses honest.
• Health of Key Players: Finally, a couple of important pieces have injury histories – Johnson (shoulder) and Cassiá (knee) are coming off lost seasons, and even Storr missed time at Kansas with minor ailments. Depth helps mitigate this, but any prolonged absence in the backcourt (especially at point guard) could hurt. The staff will need to manage minutes and keep players fresh for March.

Chris Beard’s Style and System Fit








In year three under Chris Beard, we have a good idea of the Rebels’ intended identity: tough, physical defense and opportunistic offense. Beard’s hallmark is the “no-middle” defensive scheme he popularized at Texas Tech – a packed-line strategy designed to keep ball-handlers out of the paint and baseline, funneling them into contested shots . Last season, Ole Miss improved dramatically on defense, holding opponents to 68.5 PPG and often dictating a slower tempo when needed. Expect this group to continue that trend:

• Defense: With added length on the perimeter (Storr 6’7, Giffa 6’2 but long wingspan, Kamardine 6’4, etc.) and more rim protection inside, Ole Miss could be a stout defensive unit. Beard will likely employ aggressive help defense to deny drives (the no-middle principle) and count on shot-blockers like Scott and Chest to erase mistakes at the rim . Given the roster’s versatility, we could see switches and occasional trapping – for instance, a lineup of Johnson, Giffa, Storr, Dia, Chest has switchability 1–5. Beard also preaches toughness: charges, diving for loose balls, rebounding with aggression. The newcomers, particularly those from Beard’s recruiting (Chest, Perry, etc.), were brought in for their defensive potential as much as offense. An interesting wildcard is that Beard brought in Mark Adams (his former TTU assistant and defensive guru) as a defensive analyst this offseason . That suggests Ole Miss will double down on perfecting the no-middle scheme. If the players buy in, this team could be one of the SEC’s better defensive squads, turning stops into transition points.
• Offense: Offensively, Beard’s teams have often been pragmatic – he adapts to his personnel. At Texas Tech, when he had shot-makers, he ran motion offense with lots of movement; at Ole Miss last year, with a true point (Pedulla) and shooters like Murrell, they ran a balanced attack that averaged ~77–78 PPG . This season, we might see a more up-tempo, transition-oriented offense at times, given the athleticism and depth. Players like Storr, Johnson, and Giffa excel in the open court. Look for Beard to push them to run off rebounds and turnovers. In the half-court, expect a heavy dose of pick-and-roll involving Johnson or Giffa with Dia or Scott – forcing defenses to choose between a rolling big or kick-outs to shooters. Beard also loves “motion strong” sets (a variation of motion offense) and isolations on the elbow for wings. With this roster, isolation opportunities for Storr or Giffa to create should be frequent. The offensive style can be described as positionless to an extent: multiple ball-handlers, swing the ball for the best shot, and exploit mismatches (e.g., post up Dia on a smaller defender or let a quick guard blow by a slower big on a switch). If all goes well, Ole Miss will have a balanced attack where four or five players average 8–12 points and a different hero steps up each game.

One thing Beard will surely emphasize is rebounding and toughness, as noted. Last year’s Rebels were decent but not elite on the boards; this roster has the pieces to dominate the glass. Securing defensive rebounds will allow them to run, which suits guys like Storr and Johnson. Offensively, second-chance points from Chest, Dia, and Scott could become a trademark (think of Beard’s Tech team in 2019 that always seemed to get a put-back in crunch time). Overall, the cultural fit of these newcomers to Beard’s style appears strong – many of them (Chest, Johnson, Giffa) have a defensive mindset or chip on their shoulder that matches Beard’s ethos. The key will be getting them to gel within the system rather than relying solely on individual talent.








Comparing to Last Year’s Sweet 16 Team








Last year, Ole Miss shocked many by reaching the Sweet 16 (their first NCAA trip since 2019, and second Sweet 16 ever) . That team finished 24–12 (10–8 SEC) and overachieved relative to preseason expectations. How does this new roster stack up against the 2024–25 squad?





On paper, the 2025–26 Rebels are more talented top-to-bottom. They have greater size, more scoring options, and arguably more athleticism. Last year’s team was often carried by a core of 3–4 players: point guard Sean Pedulla (15.4 PPG), veteran wing Matthew Murrell (10.8 PPG), combo forward Jaemyn Brakefield (11.1 PPG), and do-it-all guard Jaylen “Juju” Murray (10.3 PPG) . Depth was not a strong suit – by the NCAA Tournament, Ole Miss was basically playing seven guys. This year, Beard could legitimately go nine or ten deep without a huge drop-off. For example, the bench could include players like Perry, Cassiá, and maybe Klafke or the freshman forwards (Tylis Jordan and Patton Pinkins), whereas last year the bench had walk-ons playing spot minutes at times.





That said, there are question marks in replacing what last year’s team had internally:

• Proven Leadership: Last year, Murrell and Brakefield were senior leaders who had been through SEC battles. Pedulla, though a transfer, brought NCAA Tournament experience and took on a vocal leadership role. This year’s team is newer – Malik Dia is the only one who experienced that Sweet 16 run. How will they respond when adversity hits (e.g., a 2-game losing streak or hostile road environment)? The leadership void will need to be filled by someone like Dia or perhaps Giffa (who as a senior could be a leader). The Sweet 16 Rebels had undeniable chemistry and grit forged over the season; it remains to be seen if this group can replicate that intangible “togetherness” that often makes the difference in close games.
• Defense and Grit: Last year’s squad, by March, was playing elite defense – in their second-round upset they held a favored opponent to around 60 points with swarming effort. That identity took time to develop. The new roster has the tools to be as good or better defensively, but it must prove it can reach that level of cohesion. One could argue that team had fewer natural scorers, so they had to defend tenaciously; this team might have to guard against relying too much on offensive talent and neglecting the dirty work. Beard will no doubt remind them that it was defense that powered last year’s postseason run.
• Tournament Experience: Experience is mixed – some newcomers have tournament games under their belt (Storr played in NCAA at Kansas, Giffa and team won a First Four game, Scott played in NIT with Louisville, etc.), but it’s not the same as doing it together. Last year’s players experienced winning two NCAA games together, which can’t be replicated until March comes again. It’s possible this group might need to learn how to win together in postseason settings. However, the hope is that guys who’ve been around (Storr, Giffa) can draw on their individual experiences to guide the team.

In terms of talent upgrade: the Rebels essentially traded Murrell for Storr (a wash or even upgrade if Storr hits his ceiling), Pedulla for Johnson (Pedulla was proven, so that’s a question mark but Johnson has upside), Brakefield for Giffa/Chest (Brakefield’s versatility will be missed, but the combo of Giffa’s scoring and Chest’s rebounding could fill those shoes), and added a true big man in Scott that they didn’t have (last year they had no one over 6’9” playing significant minutes). The net result is a team that should be better on paper, but college basketball isn’t played on paper. It will come down to whether Beard can mold these pieces into as tough and cohesive a unit as last year’s darlings. The early expectation is that Ole Miss might take some lumps in the non-conference as roles solidify, but by SEC play they could be more dangerous than last year’s squad, with a higher ceiling come March. As one early ranking noted, the Rebels “enter year three of the Beard era expected to make the NCAA Tournament once again with a talented roster featuring transfer AJ Storr.”








SEC Outlook and Postseason Potential








The SEC will again be competitive in 2025–26, but there is opportunity for Ole Miss to climb the ladder. Last season, the Rebels finished 6th in the conference (10–8) and surprised many by advancing to the second weekend of the NCAA Tournament . This year’s media predictions likely slot Ole Miss in the middle of the pack – around 6th–8th in the SEC – due to the roster turnover. A realistic outlook: Ole Miss is viewed as an NCAA Tournament team, but probably not a preseason SEC title contender. That said, the ceiling is high if everything clicks:

• SEC Competition: Programs like Tennessee, Alabama, and Arkansas remain loaded; Kentucky has a strong freshman class; Auburn and Florida are also expected to be improved . It’s a gauntlet as always. Ole Miss might not have the star power of, say, Tennessee (coming off an Elite Eight) , but they have depth and an accomplished coach, which is often the formula for outperforming expectations. In early power rankings, Ole Miss has been placed around 7th in the SEC – in other words, squarely on the NCAA Tournament bubble. If they finish in that range, they’ll be sweating on Selection Sunday. However, this team has the talent to exceed that: cracking the top 5 in the SEC is plausible if the newcomers gel (for instance, surpassing an Arkansas or Florida team integrating their own new pieces). One advantage is continuity in coaching; while some SEC teams are breaking in new coaches or systems, Ole Miss has stability with Beard.
• Projected Record: A reasonable projection would be ~20+ wins and around 10–8 or 11–7 in SEC play again. The floor might be a bit lower than last year (if chemistry issues linger, they could hover around .500 in league play), but the ceiling is clearly higher – this roster could win 12 or 13 SEC games if all goes well. That could put them in contention for a top-4 SEC finish and a double-bye in the SEC tournament. Beard’s track record suggests Year 2 or 3 is when his teams make a leap, and we might see that pattern here.
• NCAA Tournament Ceiling: Simply put, this is a team built for March. Beard has constructed a roster with experience, depth, and defensive prowess – traits that translate in tournament settings. If Ole Miss secures an NCAA bid (which is the expectation), their ceiling is another Sweet 16 – or beyond. It’s not far-fetched: Beard has taken Texas Tech to the Final Four before with a similarly transfer-heavy team. For Ole Miss, an Elite Eight run would be historic (they’ve never gone that far), but with the right draw it’s not out of the question. More conservatively, the goal will be to make back-to-back NCAA appearances (for the first time in program history) and establish sustained success. In the preseason bracketology, ESPN’s Joe Lunardi has Ole Miss projected as a single-digit seed (around a 6–7 seed) , reflecting the national view that this is an NCAA Tournament-caliber roster. Once you’re in the Big Dance, as last year showed, anything can happen – the Rebels proved they can win as an underdog. This time, they might not be such underdogs.

Hobert Grayson, a 6’6” wing from Ouachita Baptist, is entering the transfer portal after a standout junior season. He averaged 21.8 points, 11.0 rebounds, and 2.3 assists per game, earning Second Team All-American honors and leading his team to a 22-8 record—their best since 1987 .





Key Stats:

• 21.8 PPG, 11.0 RPG, 2.3 APG
• 653 points and 331 rebounds—both fourth in Ouachita’s single-season records
• 52 steals, tying for eighth in school history
• Shooting: 58.3% FG, 81.4% FT

Fit with Chris Beard’s Ole Miss Team:


Chris Beard is overhauling the Ole Miss roster, bringing in eight transfers, including AJ Storr (Kansas), Koren Johnson (Louisville), Corey Chest (LSU), and Kezza Giffa (High Point) . With only one returning starter, Malik Dia, there’s ample opportunity for newcomers to make an impact.





Grayson’s strengths align well with Beard’s system:

• Rebounding: His 11.0 RPG addresses the team’s need for strong board presence.
• Versatility: At 6’6”, he can guard multiple positions, fitting Beard’s defensive schemes.
• Efficiency: High shooting percentages indicate smart shot selection and finishing ability.

Potential Role:


Grayson could serve as a high-energy reserve or compete for a starting spot, depending on how his skills translate to the SEC level. His rebounding and defensive capabilities make him a valuable asset, especially in a system that values toughness and versatility.





Conclusion:


While transitioning from Division II to the SEC is a significant leap, Grayson’s production and skill set suggest he has the potential to contribute meaningfully to Ole Miss’s revamped roster. His addition could bolster the team’s depth and physicality, key components in Beard’s coaching philosophy.







In summary, the 2025–26 Ole Miss Rebels present an intriguing blend of experienced transfers and one proven returner, setting the stage for a potentially exciting season in Oxford. The team’s strengths – depth, versatility, and defensive mindset – align perfectly with Coach Beard’s style. Key questions about chemistry and shooting will need to be answered, but if they are, Ole Miss has the makings of a dark-horse contender in the SEC. A return to the NCAA Tournament is a very realistic goal, and this squad has the upside to match or even surpass last year’s surprise Sweet 16 run. In a conference full of powerhouses, Ole Miss won’t sneak up on anyone this time – but with this new-look roster, the Rebels look ready to prove that last season’s success was just the beginning of their ascent .