Not throwing stones, but you guys were adamant last year that Matt Luke wasn't the problem when everyone was complaining about our poor offensive line recruiting and development. Indeed, I remember on more than one occasion on the podcast that you guys basically said that those who thought Matt Luke was a liability didn't know what they were talking about. Fast forward a year. The issues that existed a year ago have been magnified even more, but now your tunes seem to have changed judging by the Memphis post-game podcast. Given that you guys have more contacts within and around the program than 99% of us do, what has changed your opinion? I suspect that losing Drew Richmond impacted Jeffrey's opinion at least in part, but I'd be interested to know if that's true for all of you. Indeed, this has seemed to be obvious now for more than 2 years, so I'd be interested to know why your viewpoint has suddenly changed. Obviously Freeze is the most culpable at the end of the day for hiring him and deciding to go all in on some recruits without a backup plan, but Luke has been considered a below average coach and recruiter everywhere he has been. Indeed, Orgeron called him lazy, and while you can say what you want about Eddie O, the guy knew recruiting. I'm not asking for your to call for the guy's head, but I'm interested on when the worm turned for you guys.
