Please some lawyers help me. I fully understand in class action or any lawsuit that the trial lawyers try to follow or go get the money anyway possible, but tell me how are the schools on the hook in this House Case? When this amateur model was started by the NCAA, a scholarship was a good deal for the athletes, but as we know TV money changed that. Now the member schools could not pay the players for their NIL or anything else for that matter per the NCAA. If the NCAA even thought that you were providing impermissible benefits, they would hammer you, ask Ole Miss. Now when the NCAA gets sued for policies of their own making, why are the member schools finically responsible for policies that they had no control over? To me it similar to suing Firestone workers as well as Firestone when they had a class action lawsuit for some faulty tires.
One thing that I do not understand about the House Case
- Thread starter chattreb
- Start date
Similar threads
