As the title says, these will be random thoughts in bullet format without much context. I am shooting straight from the hip, with a very shallow DOK.
1. NIL - The only way to control NIL is for the players to become university employees with contractual obligations. Until this is done, expect the price for top-tier talent to continue to skyrocket.
2. Collectives - The way forward that is best for CFB is for collectives to come under the university umbrella and NIL to become what it was supposed to be, extra money for players who are compensated for providing services such as advertising and appearances at events.
3. Transfer Portal - I defer this topic to Neal. His ideas about the portal are better than any other I have heard or thought about. He has spoken about this numerous times on podcasts and on this site.
4. Signing Period - Allow a player to sign when he commits, beginning with the 1st day of August of his senior year. If he won't sign, then he isn't committed. Ridiculous situations like what happened on signing day would be eliminated if this were allowed.
5. Eligibility - End the redshirting charade and give the players 5 years to play 5 years. Any exception to the rule must include serious medical hardship that is reviewed by an independent board to determine severity.
I wrote a post on this site a little over a year ago in which I expounded on some initial thoughts that I had about how to reign in NIL and create parity similar to the NFL model by including the NFL and having the schools become affiliated with NFL franchises (2 per NFL team in the Power 4, 2 per team in the G5), having a draft for players, and putting the players under contract. Make attending the university something that is part of the package, but not mandatory for the players while playing.
This board did not receive my thoughts very positively. I saw the comments made by the Milwaukee Bucks owner recently where he proposed the universities sell 51% stakes in the teams. This sounds very similar to what I proposed over a year ago.
That said, I am not sure I am as sold on the NFL taking ownership concept now as I was then. I still believe schools being affiliated with NFL franchises would grow the interest in the game (imagine Ole MIss gaining the entire city/region of Nashville as fans because of it being affiliated with the Titans) and would provide much-needed order and structure. However, the idea of schools "selling" controlling interest in their sports teams is a hard pill to swallow for a CFB fan like me.
It is my opinion that we have started down a slippery slope that does not seem to have a bottom in sight at the moment. I believe that the decision-makers need to start thinking about 2nd and 3rd order effects of the reactive measures that CFB ( and MBKB) have put in place and take proactive steps to slow this runaway train down before it crosses that proverbial Rubicon.
Otherwise, the arms race will only get larger, and young people, most under the age of 21, will suddenly come into huge sums of money with little to no knowledge of how to manage it or dispense it wisely. Shady characters, already a growing problem, will wield more influence now than they do in things that were initially a good idea, such as AAU.
The NBA invoked an age rule after so many young people who were drafted out of high school blew the money they had thrown at them and rarely developed the potential that got them drafted and paid at an age too young to understand what life was about (Kobe and LBJ are notable exceptions).