If continuity was valued, Jones would have been retained.Originally posted by em6126:
Surely Dan Jones would endorse her. And there is something to be said for continuity
Take your blinders off and look past "Ole Miss" and "rebels", which are NOT in jeopardy, as you see it.Originally posted by em6126:
very disappointing...so close to nailing this guy and he wiggles off the hook
even if he agrees to two years, he can do a lot of damage in two years
this will just embolden him further...you can kiss "ole miss" and "rebels" good bye
and Bjork and Freeze seem to be pretty much lapdogs.....libs win, I lose
so anyone looking for two in the South Cub
Originally posted by lp4Rebs:
jones brings more disgrace to OM:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/man-charged-noose-left-integration-statue-ole-miss-29958416
"This shameful and ignorant act is an insult to all Americans and a violation of our most strongly-held values," Attorney General Eric Holder said... "By taking appropriate action to hold wrongdoers accountable, the Department of Justice is sending a clear message that flagrant infringements of our historic civil rights will not go unnoticed or unpunished."
"It has taken time, but the process has worked and I'm confident justice will be done," Ole Miss Chancellor Dan Jones said in a statement Friday.
Please give the details of when, where and why Dan Jones ever incited racial conflicts. Good luck.Originally posted by lp4Rebs:
jones will do anything he can to continue his hostile occupation of OM including inciting racial conflicts.
Don't hold your breath expecting a response from this one. He's already been banned from the OM Spirit free board for making the same ridiculous and stupid claims there.Originally posted by TheRebels'Advocate:
Please give the details of when, where and why Dan Jones ever incited racial conflicts. Good luck.Originally posted by lp4Rebs:
jones will do anything he can to continue his hostile occupation of OM including inciting racial conflicts.
Overreaction? What should Jones have done? Pretend it didn't happen? Downplay the incident? Sweep it under the rug? The media would have a field day with that because that's what they would EXPECT Ole Miss (and the state of MS) to do, when considering it's past. You're worried about negative attention? Sweep it under the rug and see how fast Sharpton is in Oxford leading the charge.Originally posted by zreb:
His over reaction in the Meredith incident is plainer than the nose on your face. That should have need defused but no he had to holler for more roper playing into media's hands . A child could have handled that better. Sure reprimand the doers but total overkill on the rest of the bs . That's not the sole reason he should go but it typifies his ego for attention and love for media attention even if negative for om.
That's quite a list...Which one(s) did Dan Jones incite? I'll pick one...Was it the incident of students yelling racial slurs while "protesting" Obama's re election? How was this incited by Jones? At this point I starting to believe that you're being deliberately obtuse with your reasoning. Trolling?Originally posted by lp4Rebs:
A Partial List of Racial Incidents Incited by jones..
https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGHP_enUS525US525&q=dan+jones+ole+miss+racial+incidents
Give him enough time and he'll blame Chancellor Jones for the deteriorating state of race relations in the entire state of Mississippi. He did on the Spirit free board.Originally posted by TheRebels'Advocate:
That's quite a list...Which one(s) did Dan Jones incite? I'll pick one...Was it the incident of students yelling racial slurs while "protesting" Obama's re election? How was this incited by Jones? At this point I starting to believe that you're being deliberately obtuse with your reasoning. Trolling?Originally posted by lp4Rebs:
A Partial List of Racial Incidents Incited by jones..
https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGHP_enUS525US525&q=dan+jones+ole+miss+racial+incidents
It doesn't surprise me that you've chosen to side with an intellectual and mental deficient, considering ^^THIS^^ response.Originally posted by zreb:
It only labeled some drunkass kids for life, that's all. Was it dumb? Sure, but not expulsion. A university says they want all open minds but it's act sully only open to their way . Hypocrisy r them. You can chastise them but that's it. They didn't speak for the university so what dumbasses thought they did?
Put the blame where it belongs...These students labeled themselves when they committed these repugnant acts and you find fault with the university.Originally posted by zreb:
It only labeled some drunkass kids for life, that's all. Was it dumb? Sure, but not expulsion. A university says they want all open minds but it's act sully only open to their way . Hypocrisy r them. You can chastise them but that's it. They didn't speak for the university so what dumbasses thought they did?