Seems like PSU

[zreb]

got a 4 year ban and appealed to 2. Didn't USC appeal theirs successfully too? Maybe they reconsider and cut it to this year.

 

[BlindsideHeckler]

got a 4 year ban and appealed to 2. Didn't USC appeal theirs successfully too? Maybe they reconsider and cut it to this year.

Haha....this morning you thought a bowl ban was no big deal, now you are scheming to get them back? Haha...

 

[zreb]

Haha....this morning you thought a bowl ban was no big deal, now you are scheming to get them back? Haha...

It isn't you just have your panties up your crack. I asked a question and you don't know shit!

 

[1olereb]

It isn't you just have your panties up your crack. I asked a question and you don't know shit!

All that Blindsideheckler does is try to stir the pot... just put him on ignore.....

 

[BlindsideHeckler]

All that Blindsideheckler does is try to stir the pot... just put him on ignore.....

Be more like Em, he's a good and rational OM fan.

 

[zreb]

All that Blindsideheckler does is try to stir the pot... just put him on ignore.....

I've had him on ingore-rant for some time now. I fig he got declined at the admissions office at some point.

 

[1olereb]

I've had him on ingore-rant for some time now. I fig he got declined at the admissions office at some point.

Lol.. he can't stand when you don't agree with him.. he really can't stand for anyone else to have their own opinions..

 

[BlindsideHeckler]

I've had him on ingore-rant for some time now.

Dude you replied to me a couple of days ago LOL

 

[JJTopp99]

got a 4 year ban and appealed to 2. Didn't USC appeal theirs successfully too? Maybe they reconsider and cut it to this year.

It is true PSU got the NCAA sanctions reduced, including the four-year bowl ban. But it wasn't because of the officially announced reasons released by the NCAA.

It happened after the state (Pennsylvania Governor) threatened to take the NCAA to federal court over the matter. Why? Because the sanctions were overly harsh and levied as a result of criminal activities of one individual. The NCAA simply overstepped it bounds since they have absolutely no jurisdiction in criminal cases. So, when the state threatened to take them to court, the NCAA quickly back-peddled and greatly reduced PSU's sanctions. A court battle would have been a major embarrassment for the NCAA and Mark Emmert knew he was legally "skating on thin ice" for overstepping his authority.

Link: https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/...to-Sue-NCAA-Over-PSU-Sanctions-185375601.html

 

[kimber6]

It is true PSU got the NCAA sanctions reduced, including the four year bowl ban. But it wasn't because of the officially announced reasons released by the NCAA.

It happened after Penn State threatened to take the NCAA to court over the matter. Why? Because the sanctions were levied as a result of criminal activities of one individual. The NCAA simply overstepped it bounds since they have absolutely no jurisdiction in criminal cases. When PSU threatened to take them to court over the matter, the NCAA quickly back-peddled and greatly reduced PSU's sanctions (via a "behind the scenes" agreement, AKA as an out of court settlement). A court battle would have been a major embarrassment for the NCAA and Emmert knew he was on thin ice for overstepping his authority.

PSU didn't do anything. A state politician wanted to keep the $60 million fine within the state of Pa, that's when it started.