Or until they run out maybe? Not bad. I actually found one that looked pretty solid. The largest I saw was ~7.5 lbs

Another outlet reported that Julius Buelow is seeking a waiver for another year of eligibility. Am told there is no truth to this. He will play the bowl game and then turn his attention to NFL Draft prep

I know the NFL doesn’t care and they’ll get their numbers, but I don’t care ab them. Just remembered they are having games.

I’ll be watching playoff games and keeping up with bowl mania.

Login to view embedded media
Bagged and tagged. Apologies to @GolfReb83 if this has already been posted.

Anyone tried? Going to start in January

While I know there’s plenty of examples of great players playing in other leagues, I have to think some of these guys are just for depth. I also think some of these are going to be good players. The kid from Marshall is a really good player from what I’ve been told from a friend that’s a Marshall fan.

Who do yall think are coming in to be starters and who do you think are depth pieces?

Login to view embedded media
Read the comments. This is really weird.
Everyone knows what happens yesterday. This guy thinks this was some heroic work by himself and State…

Look, I'd love to have Oatis too (not at the alleged price tag I've seen), but let's not forget we signed William Echols last year, a guy Pete had as the #1 player in the state. I expect him to have a major role next season.

Mean that Deion Smith might have more eligibility?

Lol. Cutting the cord was so awesome. Almost like free TV with no more cable bill! Yaaay technology.

• 2017: Launched at $35 per month
  
  
• 2019: Increased to $50 per month
  
  
• 2020: Increased to $64.99 per month
  
  
• March 2023: Increased to $72.99 per month
• 
  
• Jan 2025 Increasing to $82.99 per month

Sign him up next year. My lord.

Spread is -23. Even without Murrell, feels very possible. USM missing some players as well. Hotty Toddy!

I was discussing this with some friends of mine. This lawsuit is really interesting when you think of long term ramifications.

The lawsuit at face value is about an entity's ability to limit a person's earning potential. Pavia is basically saying that his JUCO years should not have counted toward eligibility because at the JUCO level he had limited to no earning potential. While now, though his eligibility has ended, he still has earning potential and the NCAA doesn't have the right to limit that.

1.) I think this argument has merit when it comes to antitrust laws. Imagine the Aerospace industry coming down and telling a pilot he can no longer work for Spirit. You either have to go work for American Airlines, Delta, etc. Or go home. Seems kinda ludacris when you think about it.

2.) I think this would be extremely positive for JUCO and FCS schools. "Hey kid, you didn't get the money you were looking for? Don't waste eligibility sitting on the bench for years, come play a couple of years with us, and now it no longer counts towards your eligibility at the D1 level with the potential to increase your overall earning potential."

3.) BUT (and what I don't see other people discussing) I also think if this lawsuit comes out in the favor of Pavia, potentially eligibility years will be completely out the window. It essentially becomes the same antitrust argument. If someone like Jaylen Milroe can stay in college and earn more guaranteed money than he could in the NFL, and chose to make a 10-12 year career at the college level, how could the NCAA legally stop his earning potential?? As long as he had value, and a college is willing to pay him.... It makes for a very interesting can of worms, to say the least.

Just curious on your thoughts @Neal McCready @Chase Parham @tsiskey @Brian Rippee @Jeffrey Wright

and of course anyone else that has opinions.