Hey @Neal McCready and @Chase Parham, I hear what y’all are saying, but there’s still something I don’t understand.
In the scenario where prior to revenue sharing Ole Miss had $15 million NIL and Duke had $3 million NIL, yall mentioned now Ole Miss would have around $19 million and Duke would have $16 million. Where is Duke getting the extra $13 million? I would assume it’s not boosters because they would’ve had more NIL. So is it budget cuts? If so, why would Ole Miss and SEC schools not have similar cuts opportunities?
In the scenario where prior to revenue sharing Ole Miss had $15 million NIL and Duke had $3 million NIL, yall mentioned now Ole Miss would have around $19 million and Duke would have $16 million. Where is Duke getting the extra $13 million? I would assume it’s not boosters because they would’ve had more NIL. So is it budget cuts? If so, why would Ole Miss and SEC schools not have similar cuts opportunities?
